Kajian Apologetis Terhadap Kontroversi Kemanusiaan Dan Ketidakbersalahaan Yesus Kristus
Abstract
The context of understanding the humanity and innocence of Jesus gave rise a theological controversy. The reason is, the all-perfect God who became human in Jesus Christ is difficult to maintain because He is a limited figure and is considered to have made mistakes. For example Jesus' ignorance regarding the person who touched His robe (Mark 5:30-32 and Luke 8 :45), Jesus' ignorance of what will happen in the last days (Mark 13:27-32), Jesus' mistake in calling Zechariah son of Berechiah (Matthew 23:35; 2 Chronicles 24:20) and the wrong behavior of Jesus who was angry in the Temple (Matthew 21:12-16; Luke 19:45-46; John 2:15-16). The purpose of this study is to provide a biblical description in an apologetic frame as a form of a refutation of these assumptions. This study uses a qualitative method with an apologetic approach. An understanding of the person of Jesus needs to be seen comprehensively with the context that binds it. The assumptions about Jesus' guilt and ignorance are not substantially based on a comprehensive and credible interpretation.
Abstract View: 528, 
pdf Download: 467
Downloads
References
Athanasius, Saint. De Incarnatione Verbi Dei: Athanasius On the Incarnation of the Word of God. Diterjemahkan oleh Sister Penelope Lawson. Religious Tract Society, 1903.
Bray, Gerald. Allah Telah Berfirman Sejarah Theologi Kristen. Vol. 1. Surabaya: Momentum, 2019.
Browning, W.R.F. A Dictionary of the Bible. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 2009.
Burge, Gary M. Interpreting the Gospel of John. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books House, 1992.
Carson, D.A. Expositor’s Bible Commentary: Matthew & Mark, Volume 9. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, -.
Creswell, John. Penelitian Kualitatif dan Desain Riset: Memilih di antara LIma Pendekatan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2015.
Daley, Brian E. In the Shadow of the Incarnation: Essays on Jesus Christ in the Early Church in Honor of Brian E. Daley, S.J. Disunting oleh Peter W. Martens. 1 ed. Indiana: University of Notre Dame, 2008.
Davies, Oliver. Silence and the Word: Negative Theology and Incarnation. Disunting oleh Denys Turner. 1 ed. Cambridge: United Kingdom, 2004.
Dunn, James D.G. Christology in the Making: A New Testament Inquiry Into the Origins of the Doctrine of the Incarnation. 2 ed. Grand Rapids: William B Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1996.
Ehrman, Bart D. Misquoting Jesus: The Story behind Who Changed the Bible and Why. San Francisco: Harper Collins Publishing Inc, 2005.
Ellison, H.L. The International Bible Commentary. Disunting oleh F.F. Bruce. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1979.
Fu Lan, Yap. “Allah Trinitaris Dalam Refleksi John Zizioulas.” Diskursus - Jurnal Filsafat Dan Teologi Stf Driyarkara 13, no. 2 (20 Oktober 2014): 222–41. https://doi.org/10.36383/diskursus.v13i2.81.
Green, Joel B., Scot McKnight, dan Howard Marshal. Dictionary of Jesus And The Gospel. Leicester: Intervarsity Press, 1992.
Guthrie, Donald. “Yohanes.” Dalam Tafsiran Alkitab Masa Kini, diterjemahkan oleh W.B. Sijabat, 3:302. Jakarta: YKBK, 1994.
Hadiwitanto, Handi. “Metode Kuantitatif dalam Teologi Praktis.” Gema Teologika 2, no. 1 (28 April 2017): 1. https://doi.org/10.21460/gema.2017.21.291.
Hartono, Budi. “Inspirasi, Abstraksi, Dan Historisasi Doktrin Trinitas.” Diskursus-Jurnal Filsafat Dan Teologi Stf Driyarkara 10, no. 2 (2011): 213–38. https://driyarkara.ac.id/jurnal-diskursus/index.php/diskursus/article/view/192/108.
Hodgson, Peter C. “The Incarnation of God: An Introduction to Hegel’s Theological Thought as Prolegomena to a Future Christology . Hans Küng , J. R. Stephenson.” The Journal of Religion 70, no. 2 (April 1990): 267–69. https://doi.org/10.1086/488364.
Horton, Michael. “Affirming Moser’s Well-Qualified Totus Christus.” Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology 29, no. 1 (Februari 2020): 43–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063851219892188.
Irenaeus. Scandal of the Incarnation: Irenaeus Against the Heresies. Disunting oleh Hans Urs von Balthasar. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1990.
Maraval, Pierre. “Basil Studer, Trinity and Incarnation. The Faith of the Early Church, Translated by Matthias Westerhoff, Edited by Andrew Louth, Edinburgh, T. & T. Clark, 1995.” Revue d’Histoire et de Philosophie religieuses 75, no. 3 (1995): 342.
Metzger, Bruce M., dan Bart D Ehrman. The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration. 4 ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Michael. Incarnation and myth: The debate continued. Disunting oleh Goulder. London: SCM Press, 1979.
O’Collins, Gerald. “The Incarnation.” Dalam The Incarnation: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Incarnation of the Son of God, disunting oleh Stephen T. Davis dan Daniel Kendall, xx. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Rea, Michael C., ed. Oxford Readings in Philosophical Theology: Trinity, Incarnation, and Atonement. 1 ed. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Reiling, J., dan J.L. Swellengrebel. Pedoman Penafsiran Injil Lukas. Jakarta: LAI & Yayasan Bakti Budaya, 2005.
Sanchez, Michelle Chaplin. Calvin and the Resignification of the World Creation, Incarnation, and the Problem of Political Theology in the 1559 Institutes. Massachusetts: Harvard Divinity School, 2019.
Smith, James KA. Speech and theology: Language and the logic of incarnation. Routledge, 2005.
Sunarko, Adrianus. Kristologi: Tinjauan Historis-Sistematik. Jakarta: Penerbit Obor, 2017.
Theron, Stephen. Thought and Incarnation in Hegel. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2020.
Copyright (c) 2021 Manna Rafflesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
_-_Copy.jpg)
1.jpg)
.jpg)
_-_Copy.jpg)
_-_Copy1.jpg)
.jpg)
_-_Copy.jpg)
_-_Copy.jpg)
