THE CONFLICT OF FOREST MANAGEMENT IN KINIPAN: HUMAN RIGHTS, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, AND THEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES

  • Bimbing Kalvari Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Teologi Jakarta
  • Keloso S. Ugak Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Gereja Kalimantan Evangelis
  • Idrus Sasirais Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Gereja Kalimantan Evangelis
Keywords: ethics, eco-theological, conflict, customary forest, Kinipan

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the eco-theological ethical review of the conflict over a customary forest in Kinipan. The method used is qualitative with a phenomenological approach. The study results show that the customary forest conflict in Kinipan is caused by differences in perspectives between the Kinipan community and external parties (government and companies) on the utilization of the forest. The Kinipan community regards the forest as a source of livelihood, cultural sustainability, and happiness, while external parties consider the forest an economic resource. From an ethical perspective, this conflict can be seen as a clash between the collective ethics of the Kinipan community and the individualistic ethics of the external parties. From a theological perspective, this conflict can be seen as a clash between the belief of the Kinipan community in human responsibility to care for nature as a form of obedience to God and the belief of external parties that formal legal power is a source of legitimacy for forest utilization.

  Abstract View: 298, Pdf Download: 253

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alviolita, Fifink Praiseda. “Perlindungan Hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat Terhadap Perbuatan Kriminalisasi Dalam Mempertahankan Tanah Ulayat,” n.d.

Asnawi, M. Natsir. “Interrelation of Ethics, Law, and Justice.” In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business Law and Local Wisdom in Tourism (ICBLT 2022), edited by I Nyoman Putu Budiartha, Ade Saptomo, Peter Verhezen, Siti Hafsyah Idris, Cesaltina Angela Soares, Eddy Lisdiyono, Faisal Santiago, Eddy Pratomo, Ahmad Sudiro, and Anthon Freddy Susanto, 333–44. Paris: Atlantis Press SARL, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-93-0_40.

Ating. interview by authors in Kinipan, October 29, 2022.

Bagus Putu Prajna Yogi, Ida, Sunarningsih Sunarningsih, Vida Pervaya Rusianti Kusmartono, Citra Iqliyah Darojah, and Gauri Vidya Dhaneswara. “Sebaran Permukiman Kuno Pada DAS Lamandau Di Kalimantan Bagian Barat Daya: Perspektif Arkeologi Keruangan.” Purbawidya: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Arkeologi 10, no. 1 (July 8, 2021): 45–62. https://doi.org/10.24164/pw.v10i1.383.

Banawiratma, J.B. 10 Agenda Pastoral Transformatif. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2002.

Basri, Hasan, Hasiun Budi, Alwin Teniro, Subhan Ab, Muhsin Efendi, and Achmad Surya. “Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Merumuskan Kebijakan Pada Musrenbang Kampung,” 2022.

Bogdan, R. C., and S. K Biklen. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1992.

Diener, Ed. “Subjective Well-Being.” Psychological Bulletin 95, no. 3 (1984): 542–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542.

Diener, Ed, Shigehiro Oishi, and Richard E. Lucas. “Personality, Culture, and Subjective Well-Being: Emotional and Cognitive Evaluations of Life.” Annual Review of Psychology 54, no. 1 (February 2003): 403–25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056.

Eid, Michael, and Randy J. Larsen, eds. The Science of Subjective Well-Being. New York: Guilford Press, 2008.

Endraswara, Suwardi. Metode, teori, teknik penelitian kebudayaan: ideologi, epistemologi, dan aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Widyatama, 2006.

Guste. interview by authors in Kinipan, October 28, 2022.

Hengky, Willem. interview by authors in Kinipan, October 22, 2022.

Huraerah, Abu, Rudi Martiawan, and Yaya Mulyana. “Ketidakadilan Bagi Masyarakat Miskin Dalam Aksesibilitas Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional di Kota Bandung” 9, no. 1 (2019).

Isa, Stefanus. interview by authors in Kinipan, October 29, 2022.

Khoirudin, Muh Zaid, and Desi Erawati. “Khoirudin,” n.d.

Maggang, Elia. “Menampakkan Corak Biru Kekristenan Indonesia: Sebuah Perspektif Ekoteologi.” Indonesian Journal of Theology 7, no. 2 (December 30, 2019): 162–88. https://doi.org/10.46567/ijt.v7i2.149.

Masinambow, Yornan, and Yuansari Octaviana Kansil. “Kajian Mengenai Ekoteologi dari Perspektif Keugaharian.” Shamayim: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristiani 1, no. 2 (May 5, 2021): 122–32. https://doi.org/10.51615/sha.v1i2.20.

Mathilda, Sterra Helena, Binsar Jonathan Pakpahan, and Sandro Hasoloan Tobing. “Sistem Ladang Gilir Balik Sebagai Ekoteologi Masyarakat Dayak.” Jurnal Teologi Berita Hidup 4, no. 1 (September 21, 2021): 117–37. https://doi.org/10.38189/jtbh.v4i1.150.

Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Jakarta: UI Press, 1992.

Ngabalin, Marthinus. “Ekoteologi: Tinjauan Teologi Terhadap Keselamatan Lingkungan Hidup.” CARAKA: Jurnal Teologi Biblika dan Praktika 1, no. 2 (September 28, 2020): 118–34. https://doi.org/10.46348/car.v1i2.22.

Porobaten, Sudirman. “Implementasi Pengajaran Ekoteologi Pada Jemaat GMIM Imanuel Buntong,” n.d.

Putri, Agustin Soewitomo. “Penyelamatan Bumi dan Isinya dalam Pandangan Ekoteologi: Sebuah Analisis Biblikal.” Angelion: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen 1, no. 2 (January 4, 2021): 164–81. https://doi.org/10.38189/jan.v1i2.76.

Putri, Nadila Utami, Nizam Zakka Arrizal, and Fayza Ilhafa. “Seminar Nasional Hukum Dan Pancasila Vol. 1, 4 Juli 2022” 1 (2022).

Riswan. interview by authors in Kinipan, October 29, 2022.

Serfiyani, Cita Yustisia, Ari Purwadi, and Ardhiwinda Kusumaputra. “Declarative System in Preventing the Criminalisation of Indigenous People for Adat Rights Conflicts in Indonesia.” Sriwijaya Law Review 6, no. 2 (July 30, 2022): 254. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss2.1359.pp254-267.

Sihombing, Andy Tonggo Michael, and Ricky Banke. “Politik Hukum Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam Di Indonesia” 7, no. 1 (2023).

Simanullang, Gonti. “Spiritualitas Ciptaan dan Hidup Ugahari.” Jurnal Filsafat 2 (2003).

Smith, Aimee E., Natalina Zlatevska, Rafi M. M. I. Chowdhury, and Alex Belli. “A Meta-Analytical Assessment of the Effect of Deontological Evaluations and Teleological Evaluations on Ethical Judgments/Intentions.” Journal of Business Ethics, January 7, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05311-x.

Subagyo, Andreas B. Pengantar Riset Kuantitatif Termasuk Teologi Dan Keagamaan. Bandung: Yayasan Kalam Hidup, 2004.

Tenny, Tenny, Johana Ruadjanna Tangirerung, Stephanus Ammai Bungaran, Yonathan Mangolo, and Agustinus Karurukan Sampeasang. “Menuju Teologi Sungai: Kajian Ekoteologi terhadap Pencemaran Sungai Sa’dan di Toraja.” Epigraphe: Jurnal Teologi dan Pelayanan Kristiani 6, no. 2 (November 30, 2022): 251. https://doi.org/10.33991/epigraphe.v6i2.392.

Widiangela, Apriska, Ika Putri Rahayu, and Lailatul Komaria. “Analisis Yuridis Problematika Pengakuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Laman Kinipan.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol.2. No.3 (March 2021).

Published
2023-04-30
How to Cite
Kalvari, B., Ugak, K. S., & Sasirais, I. (2023). THE CONFLICT OF FOREST MANAGEMENT IN KINIPAN: HUMAN RIGHTS, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, AND THEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES. Manna Rafflesia, 9(2), 426-441. https://doi.org/10.38091/man_raf.v9i2.323
Section
Articles