Analisis Dan Evaluasi Terhadap Pandangan Thomas Aquinas Tentang Gambar Allah

Adi Putra

doi:10.38091/man_raf.v7i1.128

Adi Putra Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Pelota Dunia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.38091/man_raf.v7i1.128

Keywords: Thomas Aquinas, God's Image, Analysis, Evaluation

Abstract

This study discusses the analysis and evaluation of Thomas Aquinas's view of the "image of God". Through qualitative research with a literature review approach, the following conclusions are obtained Aquinas's view of God's image is very unbiblical. Because it is more inclined to the philosophy of Plato and Aristotle. This is a characteristic of scholastic group theology. Because scholastic theologians tend to place ratios more dominant in theology than the Bible. Furthermore, the image of God carried by humans is not only in the ratio but in the totality of human existence in the earth as God's representative. The image of God in humans experiences severe damage after the fall of man in sin. The ratio is no better than the body. In other words, all parts of human beings, whether spirit, ratio, morals, body, when created in a noble or very good state. This rejects Aquinas's view that there are inferior forces. Finally, through this research, we want to stress that the image of the true God is in Christ. This has the effect that it is only through Christ that the image of God that has been badly damaged can be repaired.

Abstract View: 587,

pdf Download: 597

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bauer’s, Walter. A Greek-English Lexicon of The New Testament And Other Early Christian Literature (BDAG) Third Edition. Disunting oleh Frederick William Danker. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2000.

Berkhof, Louis. Teologi Sistematika 2: Doktrin Manusia. Surabaya: Momentum, 1995.

Bray, Gerald. Allah Adalah Kasih: Theologi Biblikal dan Sistematis. Surabaya: Momentum, 2020.

Brown, Christopher M. https://www.iep.utm.edu/aquinas/, t.t.

Brown, Collin. Filsafat dan Iman Kristen Jilid 1. Surabaya: Momentum, 2011.

Enns, Paul. The Moody Handbook of Theology 2. Malang: SAAT, 2010.

F. Brown, S. Driver, C. Briggs. The Brown-Driver Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon. Hendrickson Publishers, 1907.

Gunawan, Imam. “Metode penelitian kualitatif.” Universitas Negeri Malang, 2013. http://fip.um.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/3_Metpen-Kualitatif.pdf.

Hamilton, Victor P. The New International Commentary on The Old Testament: The Book of Genesis Chapter 1-17. Michigan, USA: Grand Rapids, 1990.

Herman Bavinck. Dogmatika Reformed Jilid 2: Allah dan Prolegomena. Surabaya: Momentum, 2012.

Hoekema, Anthony A. Manusia: Ciptaan Menurut Gambar Allah. Surabaya: Momentum, 2003.

“https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Aquinas,” t.t.

“http://www.iep.utm.edu/aquinas/5/6/2013,” t.t.

Patton, Michael Quinn, Budi Puspo Priyadi, dan Kamdani. Metode evaluasi kualitatif. Pustaka Pelajar, 2006.

Pratt, Richard L. Designed For Dignity. Surabaya: Momentum, 2002.

Ramadhon. “Kebahagiaan Dalam Pandangan Thomas Aquinas Dan Hamka.” http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/una/article/download/15159/pdf, t.t.

Sproul, R.C. Kebenaran-kebenaran Dasar Iman Kristen. Malang: SAAT, 2008.

Timothy Friberg. Analytical Greek Lexicon. Trafford Publishing, 2005.